The Hate of the Muslim
World's Cartoons
By John Perazzo; FrontPageMagazine.com | February 16, 2006
Aggrieved Muslims are astir, ostensibly venting
their outrage over a series of cartoons published in an obscure Danish
newspaper that were deemed disrespectful of the Prophet Mohammed. The current
riots are reminiscent of last year’s violent eruptions in response to a false
allegation that an American soldier at the Guantanamo Bay detention center had
flushed the Koran of a prisoner down a toilet, riots that claimed 16 lives.
Allegedly “moderate” Muslims who have appeared in
the media to air the purported voice of reason, have tempered their criticisms
of the riots with reprimands against the Western press. They warn that such
unnecessary acts of “provocation” (meaning the aforementioned cartoons) only
serve to make it more difficult for Westerners to win the hearts and minds of
moderate Muslims.
Then you read the sources many of the Mideast’s
Muslims read. Consider, for instance, just a handful of published cartoons –
extremely offensive to Jews – that sparked not the faintest whisper of rebuke
in the Muslim world. All of the following may be seen on the Palestinian Media Watch website:
Other recent cartoons alternately depict Israel as a large
green alligator that eats Palestinians (October 9, 2003); a pitchfork-wielding
Satan (March 22, 2000); an octopus with a star of David on its head, reaching
up from its murky swamp to grab a dove with one of its tentacles (April 17,
2000); a rat (with a Star of David on its head) gorging itself on a block of
cheese that represents the Arab world (August 1, 2001); a worm eating the
sacred scrolls of Islamic scripture (July 25, 2003); and the lice on an Arab’s
headdress (April 23, 2003).
These
are but a few examples of the type of disrespectful, venomous garbage that gets
published all over the Islamic world on a daily basis. The targets are always non-Muslims
– mostly Jews and Christians. Muslim culture does not even bat a proverbial
eyelash when its own publications, many of which represent the officially
sanctioned views of Islamic governments, print such things. But when an outlet
of a Western nation’s free press dares – independently of any governmental
endorsement or instruction – to print a cartoon that Muslims may find
offensive, all hell breaks loose.
What
makes this especially ironic is the fact that the Islamic world generally
treats the symbols of other religions with great contempt. Recall, for
instance, when the Taliban in 2001 used tanks, explosives, and anti-aircraft
weapons to destroy all of Afghanistan’s ancient religious icons that were not
of a Muslim nature, the most notable being two colossal sculptures of Buddha
(175 feet and 120 feet high, respectively) that had been cut, probably in the
third and fifth centuries A.D., into tall, sandstone cliffs.
In
Pakistan, Muslim rioters have often driven Christians from their villages, burned
their homes, and razed their churches. In February 1996 in Egypt, a mob of
10,000 Muslim youths pillaged and burned three Christian villages in the Nile
Delta; such abominations have occurred many times there. In Kuwait, conversion
to Christianity is a crime punishable by death. Over the past two decades,
Sudan’s Muslim government (which has made it a crime to convert to
Christianity) has bombed, burned, and looted many of the country’s Christian
villages, capturing and selling into slavery countless thousands of the
inhabitants – including women and children. In Saudi Arabia, possession of a Bible may result in arrest,
deportation, or in some cases execution; the Saudi government desecrates and
burns all Bibles that its security forces confiscate at immigration points or
during raids on Christian expatriates during their private worship services.
Saudi Arabia also bans the importation or the display of crosses, Stars of
David, or any other non-Muslim religious symbols. Indonesia, Nigeria, and Iran
too are rife with anti-Christian hatred.
The
multiculturalists of the West have encouraged radical Muslims to preserve their
culture in Western nations. Now we are re-learning that tremulous appeasement
cannot purchase the goodwill of those intent on crushing “infidels” – as
evidenced by the deadly arsons and riots that erupted all over France last
November, when angry Muslims turned their wrath on the land that had made
multiculturalism its highest ideal. We are not engaged in a cultural dialogue
in which we may seek to try to “understand” our would-be murderers; we are
engaged in a protracted struggle for the survival of our way of life. The
Islamists and the appeasenik leftists are on the wrong side.
John Perazzo is the author of The Myths That Divide Us: How Lies Have Poisoned American
Race Relations. For more information on his book, click here. E-mail him at wsbooks25@hotmail.com
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21327